
The episode is a conversation between host Joseph M. Leonard and guest Rick Walker, a Canadian journalist. They discuss the concept of 'gray areas' in various contexts, such as language, law, politics, and social issues. Leonard raises examples like the spelling variation of the word 'gray/grey,' the law recognizing mitigating circumstances, and Bill Clinton's infamous quote about the definition of 'is.'
They also touch on issues like the Canadian government's new legislation regarding social media companies and news content, which has led to Facebook essentially banning news in Canada. Leonard brings up examples like rapper Tom McDonald's controversial song 'Hitting a Woman' and the US Women's Soccer team losing to a high school boys' team to explore the gray areas in gender and sports.
Throughout the discussion, Walker provides his perspective as a Canadian journalist, acknowledging the nuances and different viewpoints on various issues. The conversation covers a wide range of topics, from language and law to politics, social issues, and media censorship, all through the lens of exploring the complexities and gray areas within them.
The concept of 'gray areas' in various aspects of life, such as language, law, politics, and social issues.
The complexity of addressing gray areas and the different perspectives and nuances that contribute to them.
Examples of gray areas in language (e.g., spelling variations), law (e.g., mitigating circumstances), and social issues (e.g., gender and sports).
The unique perspective of the Canadian guest, Rick Walker, on issues like Canadian legislation and media censorship.
The host's viewpoints on controversial topics like Bill Clinton's 'definition of is' quote and transgender athletes in women's sports, which he sees as clear-cut cases without gray areas.
The role of personal agendas, motivations, and biases in shaping perspectives on gray areas.
The potential for governments and authorities to exploit gray areas for control and censorship.
The importance of examining the 'why' and motivations behind different perspectives and narratives.
"Everything in life is a gray area. All perspectives are different. Everybody looks at the world in a slightly different way." - Rick Walker
- This quote captures the central theme of the episode, which is exploring the nuances and different perspectives that create 'gray areas' in various aspects of life.
"Canada has always had strange regulations like that. That would probably seem strange to you in the United States. And it's because we traditionally with, you know, regular legacy media or mediums like radio, tv, newspapers. Canada being a huge country right on the border with, you know, right up against the United States, you have very powerful media." - Rick Walker
- This quote provides insight into the unique perspective of Walker as a Canadian journalist, explaining the rationale behind certain Canadian regulations that may seem unusual from an American viewpoint.
"No, Claiming to be a woman. No. Okay. So with that in my shows, I try not to go much more than 40 minutes." - Joseph M. Leonard
- This quote highlights Leonard's stance on the controversial issue of transgender athletes in women's sports, which he views as a clear-cut case without gray areas.
"I dare say it's not a bug, it's a feature. These fascists want that control." - Joseph M. Leonard
- This quote reflects Leonard's perspective on the Canadian government's legislation regarding social media and news content, suggesting that it is a deliberate attempt at control and censorship rather than an unintended consequence.
Chapter 1: Defining Gray Areas
Joseph M. Leonard introduces the concept of gray areas, where things are not simply black and white or good and evil, and how those who are evil often try to exploit the ambiguity of gray areas for their own gain. Rick Walker agrees and elaborates on how perspectives and worldviews lead to different interpretations of the same situation or event.
- Things are often not simply black and white or good and evil, and there are many gray areas that require careful examination.
- Different perspectives and worldviews lead to different interpretations of the same situation or event, contributing to the existence of gray areas.
Key Quotes
"Everything in life is a gray area. All perspectives are different. Everybody looks at the world in a slightly different way." by Rick Walker
- This quote emphasizes the idea that different perspectives lead to different interpretations of reality, contributing to the existence of gray areas.
Chapter 2: Gray Areas in Law and Politics
Joseph M. Leonard and Rick Walker discuss how gray areas exist in the law, where mitigating circumstances are considered, and in politics, where motivations and agendas can lead to the exploitation of ambiguity. They use examples such as theft, perjury, and the actions of politicians to illustrate their points.
- The law recognizes mitigating circumstances and varying degrees of offenses, creating gray areas that require careful consideration.
- Political agendas and motivations can lead to attempts to exploit the ambiguity of gray areas for personal gain or to excuse unethical behavior.
Key Quotes
"No, you perjured yourself before Congress, the left, because of their agenda. Want to excuse the lying because it was about sex and he's trying to play well, take the kids out of the room." by Joseph M. Leonard
- This quote highlights how political agendas can lead to the exploitation of gray areas, in this case, attempting to excuse perjury by redefining the act.
Chapter 3: Gender and Physical Differences
Joseph M. Leonard and Rick Walker discuss the gray areas surrounding gender and physical differences, particularly in the context of sports. They explore how societal norms and expectations can create double standards and how genuine physical differences between genders should be taken into account.
- Societal norms and expectations can create double standards and gray areas when it comes to gender and physical differences, particularly in the context of sports and violence.
- While genuine physical differences between genders should be acknowledged, individual circumstances, such as training and physical development, also play a role in determining capabilities.
Key Quotes
"Tom has a song. Maybe you could look it up when we're done here. Called Hitting a Woman. And that's why I brought that up. And one of the lines is you think you're a bad bitch, right? But you know how that would play out in a fight." by Joseph M. Leonard
- This quote introduces the discussion about the gray area surrounding physical differences between genders and societal norms regarding violence.
"I'm glad you made that caveat about your training level versus the female hockey because I have a younger sister. She wanted to play hockey. I mean, you know, she wanted to be on the team with me." by Joseph M. Leonard
- This quote acknowledges the importance of considering factors like training and physical development when discussing gender differences in sports.
Chapter 4: Canadian Censorship and Media Regulations
Rick Walker provides insights into the Canadian government's efforts to regulate and censor online content, including social media platforms and independent news outlets. He discusses the unintended consequences of these regulations, which have led to the blocking of both mainstream and independent news sources in Canada.
- The Canadian government's efforts to regulate online content and favor mainstream media outlets have resulted in unintended consequences, such as the complete blocking of news content on social media platforms in Canada.
- Independent news sources like Maverick News are caught in the crossfire, being blocked for Canadian audiences while remaining accessible to international audiences.
Key Quotes
"The other thing that they're trying to do is make social media companies pay the mainstream legacy media fees for the news content that they publish on the social media platforms. Facebook has told the government that they are not going to participate in that. They will. They've refused to pay. So they have said, we're just not going to carry any more news content in Canada. We're just not going to carry it." by Rick Walker
- This quote explains the Canadian government's attempt to force social media companies to pay fees to mainstream media outlets and Facebook's response, which has led to a complete ban on news content in Canada.
"So now I'm in this very unusual situation where we had this Facebook maverick news Facebook page with a pretty sizable list of subscribers. Nobody in Canada can see it and yet you in the USA can see that very same page. It is not blocked on your side." by Rick Walker
- This quote illustrates the unintended consequence of the Canadian government's regulations, where independent news sources like Maverick News are blocked for Canadian audiences but accessible to international audiences.
Note: This transcript was automatically generated using speech recognition technology. While we will make minor corrections on request, transcriptions do not currently go through a full human review process. We apologize for any errors in the automated transcript.
A
show
based
on
the
facts,
honesty,
the
man,
the
myth,
the
legend.
Christitutionalist
Joseph
M.
Leonard.
Welcome
to
constitutionalist
politics
podcast
aka
CTP
in
association
with
savage
unfiltered
podcast
the
libertybeacon.com
and
I
am
your
host
Joseph
M.
Leonard
and
that's
L,
E
N
A
R
D
C
T
P
is
your.
No,
must
no
fuss,
just
me
you
type
podcast.
As
Graham
Norton
would
say.
Let's
get
on
with
the
show.
Welcome
to
Constitutionalist
Politics
Season
1,
Episode
22.
If
you're
watching
on
the
YouTuber
Rumble
video
channel,
you'll
see
I
have
a
guest.
It
is
Rick
Walker
and
we'll
get
to
him
in
a
second
and
why
he's
here
today
is
one
of
those
odd
episodes.
Normally
if
I
have
a
guest
record
a
segment
they
would
be
segment
two
following
a
lead
in.
Well
today
we're
just
going
raw
with
Rick
the
whole
episode.
So
this
is
going
to
be
a
little
different.
And
the
topic
of
the
libertybeacon.com
piece
gray
area
or
gray
areas
part
one.
There
will
be
a
part
two.
Without
further
ado,
let
me
just
introduce
Rick
Walker
and
have
him
explain
who
he
is.
Oh,
a
Canuck.
Back
to
back
Canucks
it's
going
to
be.
I
thought
I'd
get
some
Canadian
perspective
in
the
show.
So
please
welcome
Rick
Walker.
Tell
us
a
little
bit
about
yourself
and
your
show.
Well,
thank
you
for
having
me
on
your
program
tonight,
Joseph.
It's
an
honor.
Yeah,
I'm
Canuck,
I'm
Canadian.
I
used
to
work
for
CTV
News
in
Canada
for
about
25
years.
Left
the
mainstream
media
quite
a
long
time
ago.
About
10
years
ago,
do
some
automotive
journalism.
But
these
days
my
main
focus
is
Maverick
news
which
is
our
online
free
speech,
free
media
oriented
news
platform.
A
lot
of
international
news,
U.S.
news
and
Canadian
news
of
course
because
I'm
right
here
in
Canada
and
Canadian
news
as
always
in
one
way
or
another
connected
directly
back
to
the
US
of
A.
Which
is
why
I
wanted
to
have
you
free
speech
as
far
as
YouTube
Canada
will
let
you
be
free
speech
which
is
even
more
strict
and
censored
than
YouTube
USA
that
is
true.
Touchy
in
both
places.
Let
me
get
your
reaction
to
this.
Got
my
notes
here
for
those
on
video
could
see
it.
If
you're
listening
on
audio
only,
maybe
you
can
hear
the
paper
wrestling.
I'm
gonna.
I
don't
do
scripted
but
I
do
notes
so
I
could
try
to
get
things
in.
I
want
to
read
this
specifically
regarding
gray
area
or
gray
areas
and
we
will
do
a
few
examples
but
things
are
never
usually
pure
black
and
white.
Right
and
wrong
and
good
and
evil.
And
those
who,
of
course,
are
evil
always
want
to
play
the
gray
area
to
pretend
they're
not
evil.
Right.
And
whether
it
be
this
or
anything
else,
there
are
often
various
different
camps
of
people
with
varying
own
personal
agendas
wanting
to
muddy
the
waters
for
their
own
gain.
We
need
be
smart
enough
to
dig
into
the
why,
the
motivations.
Someone
is
saying
what
as
part
of
the
determinations
of
whether
genuine
or
even
factual
or
spin
and
false
narratives
or
lies.
Your.
Your
initial
reaction
to
that?
Yes.
Okay.
Can
you
elaborate
a
little?
Yeah.
So
you
want
my
reaction
to
what?
That
there
are
gray
areas
and
sometimes
people
who
are
evil
exploit
the
ambiguity
that
comes
from
sort
of
dipping
into
the
gray
area
of
things.
Yes,
they
do
that.
Yeah,
most
definitely.
Well,
I'm
going
to
start
with
an
oddball
example.
Okay.
All
right.
The
word
gray
is
a
gray
area
in
itself.
If
you're
using
Oxford
English
or
American
English,
it
could
be
spelled
G,
R
A
Y
or
G
R
E
Y.
Right.
And
spell
checker.
Like,
I'm
holding
a
Microsoft
document
here,
and
as
I
was
doing
my
article,
I
have
my
rough
notes.
It's
not
completely
done
yet.
This
recording
may
influence
what
lands
up
in
the
final
draft,
the
spell
checkers
and
why.
I
say
in
my
book,
how
to
Write
a
Book
and
Get
It
Published.
Hints,
tips
and
techniques.
You
need
a
professional
editor
because
the
spelling
grammar
checkers,
no
matter
how
sophisticated,
still
aren't
sophisticated
enough
to
say,
like
I
take
the
Marion
Webster
write
up
on
the
difference.
Gray,
gray,
A,
E.
And
therefore,
in
the
document,
it's
spelled
both
ways.
And
the
AI
isn't
even
smart
enough
to
say
there's
a
dichotomy
here.
There's
a
discrepancy.
Do
you
really
mean
to
spell
it
two
different
ways?
The
word
gray
is
a
gray
area
in
and
of
itself.
Of
language.
Yes.
I'm
not
exactly
sure
where
we're
going
with
this,
Joseph.
Are
you
trying
to,
like,
lead
us
into
some
broader
discussion
in
politics?
Is
that
sort
of
the
idea?
Yeah,
that's
definitely
where
we're
going
to
go.
That's
just
kind
of
my
initial
broad
overall
definition
of
a
gray
area
can
be.
Indeed.
Sure.
Because
if
you
want
to
talk
about
gray
areas,
especially
as
it
relates.
Well,
it
doesn't
really
matter
what
it
relates
to.
If
you're
talking
about
politics.
Everything
in
life
is
a
gray
area.
All
perspectives
are
different.
Everybody
looks
at
the
world
in
a
slightly
different
way.
That's
why
I,
as
a
conservative,
you
know,
I
believe
in
individual
rights
and
freedoms.
I
believe
that
every
individual
is
unique.
I
don't
like
identity
politics,
because
it
sort
of
slots
people
into
specific
categories.
Categories,
groups,
people
together.
And
while
people
on
the
woke
left
always
say
diversity
is
our
strength,
in
reality,
there's
not
that
much
diversity
within
identity
politics.
True
diversity
comes
from
individuality.
That's
where
you
find
true
diversity.
Because
now
you're
talking
about
every
single
individual
being
a
unique
person.
And
we
can
be
looking
at
exactly
the
same
thing.
For
instance,
I
could
hold
up
this
cup
and
I
see
it
on
this
side
of
the
screen.
But
as
you're
looking
at
it,
you're
probably
seeing
it
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
screen.
If
you're
standing
just
a
little
bit
to
the
left
of
something,
you're
seeing
it
from
a
slightly
different
angle.
And
so
that's
partly
why
people
look
at
a
political
issue
or
even
a
political
event.
And
I
as
a
reporter
can
go
to
a
political
event
and
I
my
report
be
entirely
different
than
a
report
that's
coming
from
someone
else
with
a,
with
a
different
political
perspective.
Another
reporter
who's
doing
a
story
on
exactly
the
same
speech
from
exactly
the
same
politician
at
exactly
the
same
time.
But
they
stand
a
little
to
my
left
and
their
world
experience,
their
worldview
is
just,
you
know,
is
different
than
mine.
So
they
perceive
the
language,
they
perceive
everything
in
a.
In
a
different
way
when
they
write
their
article,
they
express
themselves
differently,
they
see
it
differently.
Everything
in
life,
it
doesn't
matter
what
it
is
you
look
at,
you're
seeing
it
from
your
perspective,
which
is
entirely
unique,
which
is
why
everything
in
life
is
actually
a
gray
area.
You
can
really
get
down
into
some
very
deep
conversations
about
science
and
philosophy
as
it
relates
to
this
very
issue,
and
even
delve
into
the
areas
of
what
is
reality?
Because
everything
revolves
around
that,
like
what
is
reality?
And
that
all
stems
from
different
perspectives
on
everything
and
why.
I
opened
with.
You
need
to
dig
into
the
why
and
motivations.
There
can
still
be
different
perspectives
from
an
honest,
internal,
different
perspective,
as
opposed
to
an
absolute
by
choice,
leftist
bent,
motivation,
agenda.
So
yeah,
you're
definitely
in
the
spirit
here.
And
the
next
thing
I
have
on
my
note
is
the
law.
We
recognize
mitigating
circumstances
of
gray
areas
like
Les
Mis.
Right.
Most
people
know
either
the
book
or
the
play
or
the
musical
or
whatever.
We
recognize
negligent
homicide
is
different
than
premeditated
murder
and
stealing
a
loaf
of
bread.
To
quote
Les
Mis,
you
don't
punish
the
same
as
a
murderer.
There's
varying
degrees
and
aspects
that's
within
the
law.
Like
here
in
the
US
I
have
no
doubt
you've
heard
aoc.
She's
just
a
loon.
And
every.
And
she's
out
talking
about
people
stealing
Gucci
bags,
Nike
shoes,
as
a
Les
Mis
example.
No,
they're
not
stealing
bread.
Look
at
some
of
these
people.
They're
obese,
running
around.
They're
not
starving,
they're
not
stealing
bread.
You
cannot
excuse
them
with
that
Les
Mis
example.
Gray
area
in
the
law.
That
again,
for
her
motivation
is
a
leftist
agenda.
Your
thoughts
on
that?
Yes,
I.
He's
doing
this
on
purpose
because
I
just.
You,
you,
I.
That's
true,
but
you,
you.
I
mean,
you're
expressing
yourself
very
clearly.
And,
and
you're
very
articulate.
I
understand
your
point.
You
fleshed
it
out
very
well.
This
is
obviously
an
issue
that's
facing
especially
I
think,
the
United
States
right
now,
the
woke
left,
finding
excuses
for
people
committing
crimes
under
the
idea
that
they've
been
so
victimized
over
generations
that
criminal
activity
is
actually
justified.
And
no,
I
don't
agree
with
that
at
all.
Theft
is.
Theft
is
theft.
So
again,
except
for,
again,
mitigating
circumstances.
Yes,
stealing
a
loaf
of
bread
because
you
have
a
starving
kid
is
entirely
different
than
me
slobs
out
there
stealing
Gucci
and
Nike.
Well,
sure,
yes.
You
know,
and
that's
why
we
have
codified
law
and
legal
precedent.
Yeah.
In
place
so
the
judges
know
how
to
deal
with
these
cases
on
a
case
by
case
basis.
And
there
are
precedents
set
through
various
court
decisions.
Next
thought
here
is
Bill
Clinton.
And
I'm
sure
you
remember
right.
Depends
on
what
the
definition
of
is
is.
No,
you
perjured
yourself
before
Congress,
the
left,
because
of
their
agenda.
Want
to
excuse
the
lying
because
it
was
about
sex
and
he's
trying
to
play
well,
take
the
kids
out
of
the
room.
A
blowjob
really
isn't
sex.
So
I
really
wasn't
lying.
I
really
didn't
perjure
myself.
It
depends
on
what
the
definition
of
is
is.
And
that's
bull.
If
you
think
that
the
sex
with
an
intern
is
no
big
deal,
own
up
to
it.
Yes,
I
had
sex
with
an
intern
in
the
Oval
Office.
It
may
not
have
been
proper,
but
it
is
what
it
is.
It
was
just
sexual.
That
has
nothing
to
do
with
my
ability
to
perform
as
president
or
not.
Yes,
but
you
know,
he
didn't
inhale.
Either,
so
there,
Rick,
is
a
great,
perfect
response.
Now,
have
you
heard
of
Jamal
Bowman?
He's
the
guy
that
pulled
the
fire
alarm.
Yes,
the
other
day.
Okay,
you
know
where
I'm
going.
Yeah.
He
literally
interrupted
a
vote
of
Congress.
Tried
to.
An
insurrection,
if
you
will.
Right.
Yeah.
Literally,
the
letter
of
the
law.
Tried
to
interfere
with
the
congressional
business
far
more
than
anyone
on
January
6
did
so.
He
needs
to
be
censured,
expelled,
a
resolution
drafted,
sent
to
Merrick
Garland,
who
will
of
course
ignore
it,
demanding
he
be
Prosecuted.
Like
these
January
6th
folk.
If
this
happened
in
your
parliament,
you'd
be
demanding
prosecution,
correct?
Depends
on
if
the
person
pulling
the
fire
alarm
is
a
Nazi
or
not.
I
don't
want
to
go
down
that
road.
Yeah,
let's
not
go
there.
Maybe
he
thought
he
was
in
a
movie
theater
and
he
felt
compelled
to
shout
fire.
Oh,
I'm
glad
you
said
that,
because
I
actually
have
that
further
down
my
notes.
Let
me
finish
with
the
insurrection
per
se.
Sure.
Because,
like
Wisconsin,
literally,
leftists
occupied
the
Wisconsin
legislature
several
years
ago
when
Scott
Walker
was
governor,
to
interrupt
proceedings
and
insurrection,
a
literal
occupation
for
a
week
plus
time,
not
a
few
hours,
wandering
around
and
then
left.
Nothing
done
about
that.
Of
course,
here
in
Michigan,
Governor
Witless,
or
Whitler,
as
I
call
her,
was
a
member
of
the
Michigan
House
at
the
time
the
Capitol
went
on
lockdown
because
leftists
trying
to
do
the
same
thing
here.
And
she
literally
broke
the
lockdown,
opened
her
office
window
to
let
insurrectionists
in,
and
yet
nothing
happens.
But
regarding
the
fire.
Yeah,
on
the
libertybeacon.com
I've
got
a
piece
about
yelling
fire
in
a
crowded
theater,
because
to
me,
that's
a
farce.
And
you
had
on
your
show
when
I
was
on
the
other
day,
who
I
contend
is
a
leftist.
Rush
Limbaugh
talked
about
this
all
the
time.
Media
Matters
tells
leftists
to
masquerade
as
Republicans,
which
is
why
the
guy
didn't
give
his
name
and
wanted
to
hide
his
face.
He
was
pretending
to
be
a
Republican.
He
agreed
with
leftist
dictates
at
every
turn.
And
he
tried
to
use
the
yell
fire
in
a
crowded
theater.
That
is
not
speech.
That
is
not
opinion.
That
is
fraud
in
the
inducement
and
incitement.
If
there
is
not
fire,
that's
not
speech.
I
mean,
at
every
turn
he
showed
he
was
not
a
small
government
Republican.
And
the
other
thing
that
I
don't.
Remember
him
trying
to
present
himself
that
way.
Oh,
he
said
it
several
times.
Oh,
well,
that's
right,
he
did.
He
said
he
was
a
Republican.
And
the
other
thing
that
really
irked
me,
do
you
remember
how
many
times
he
said,
I'm
highly
educated
and
so
are
all
my
friends,
unlike
me
and
you,
the
rub,
you
know,
the
rednecks,
the
unwashed.
Stay
with
us.
We'll
be
right
back.
Podcast
fans,
get
more
about
your
favorite
podcasts
via
deepcast
FM
transcripts
and
all
kinds
of
extra
available
information
on
your
favorite
podcast,
including
Christitutionalist
Politics
Podcast
is
listed
at
DCast
FM
as
well
as
Are
you
a
podcaster?
Well,
you
can
claim
your
free
listing
and
more
via
Deepcast
Pro.
Check
out
tinyurl.com
deepcast
pro4
podcasters
for
your
free
listing.
And
that's
the
number
four
in
there.
Tinyurl.com
deep
cast
pro4
podcasters
the
number
four
deep
cast
pro
the
number
four
podcasters
via
tinyurl.com
extension
take
care
all
you
gotta
check
them
out.
Get
more
out
of
your
podcast
whether
you're
the
podcast
store
or
the
podcast
tee.
Yeah,
I
think
I
just
invented
that
word.
The
toothless
Hayseed
hicks
from
the
back
40th.
But
what
he
really
is
a
well
educated,
indoctrinated,
trained
Pavlovian
dog.
And
anytime
the
bell
rings,
he
bites.
Well,
I
mean
people
watching
this
program
didn't
get
a
chance
to
see
that
show.
I
suppose
you
could
go
on
onto
my
channel
and
and
and
and
see
that
to
get
some
context,
but
I'm
afraid
to
comment
too
much
because
I
wouldn't
want
to
confuse
people
or
talk
about
something
that
they
don't
have
a
frame
of
reference
on
with
without
having
previously
seen
what
it
is
we're
talking
about.
But
yeah,
I
will
make
sure
I
link
to
that
show
either
on
my
live
YouTube
channel.
It's
still
on
my
YouTube
channel
under
the
Live
tab
since
I
streamed
it
live
while
we
were
on
together.
As
long
as
YouTube
leaves
it
because
of
all
those
idiosyncrasies
that
they
don't
like
us
to
talk
about.
They
may
pull
it,
but
I
know
you
put
up
an
edited
version.
I'll
go
grab
the
link
to
the
edited
version.
So.
Well,
it's
the
unedited
version
is
up
on
Rumble,
so
if
anybody
wants
to
see
the
whole
thing.
Yeah,
it's
on
there
and
on
too.
doesn't
bother
me
too
much
with
stuff
like
that.
At
least
they
haven't
so
far.
Except
that
they
took
down
our
whole
news
page
in
Canada
because
of
censorship
laws
in
Canada.
So
you
can't
see
our
news
page
in
Canada
anymore.
You
can
see
it
in
the
usa,
but
I
can't
even
watch
my
own
content
because
my
page
is
blocked
to
me
in
Canada.
But
when
I
stream
to
it,
people
in
other
countries
around
the
world
can
see
it.
How
insane
is
that?
Well,
tell
us
about.
You
know,
this
is
off
the
topic
now,
but
let's
go
there.
You
don't
have
the
first
Amendment
as
it
exists
here
in
our
Constitution.
And
you
guys
just
passed
a
law.
I
know
Ms.
Liz
on
another
show
I
discussed
with
her
supposedly
about
protecting
newsfeed
content
and
the
providers
so
that
you
have
to
pay
for
their
content.
But
what
it
really
is
is
backdoor
censorship
and
preventing
things
from
getting
to
the
people.
Is
that
how
you
see
that
there.
Are
two
pieces
of
legislation?
One
is
Bill
C18
and
the
other
is
Bill
C11.
In
a
nutshell,
what
it
is,
the
government
is
forcing
social
media
companies
to
on
the
one
hand,
give
preference
to
mainstream
legacy
media
outlets
in
search
engine
algorithms
to
push
them
up
in
search
engine
rankings
on
the,
on
the
search
engine
results
pages,
therefore
suppress
smaller
independent
outlets
in
the
in
the
interest
of
what
they
say
is
Canadian
content.
So
they
want
to
put
Canadian
content
up
up
top.
So
they
basically,
if
you
search
for
any
news
content,
that
stuff,
cbc,
ctv,
Global
News,
etc
to
pop
up
first.
The
other
thing
that
they're
trying
to
do
is
make
social
media
companies
pay
the
mainstream
legacy
media
fees
for
the
news
content
that
they
publish
on
the
social
media
platforms.
has
told
the
government
that
they
are
not
going
to
participate
in
that.
They
will.
They've
refused
to
pay.
So
they
have
said,
we're
just
not
going
to
carry
any
more
news
content
in
Canada.
We're
just
not
going
to
carry
it.
We
don't
need
it.
It's
not
what
we're.
It
doesn't
make
business
sense
for
us
to
do
it.
So
inadvertently,
as
an
unintended
consequence
of
their
new
legislation,
we
now
have
a
situation
where
effectively
banned
all
news
content,
both
independent
and
mainstream
legacy
news
content,
period.
It's
purged
it
from
Canada,
so
everything
is
blocked.
So
now
I'm
in
this
very
unusual
situation
where
we
had
this
maverick
news
page
with
a
pretty
sizable
list
of
subscribers.
Nobody
in
Canada
can
see
it
and
yet
you
in
the
USA
can
see
that
very
same
page.
It
is
not
blocked
on
your
side.
Right?
It's
very
strange.
I'm
a
former
IT
guy,
so
this
to
me.
Oh,
and
I
have
another
V.
Liberty
Beacon
piece
about
leftists
never
realizing
or
paying
attention
to
the
supposed
natural
law
of
unintended
consequences.
Or
in
my
mind,
they
know
they
just
play
dumb.
And
I
think
that's
happening
here.
They
want
it
suppressed
because
they
don't
want
people
to
have
access
to
the
content.
They
want
them
like
we
discussed
on
your
show,
dope
and
dumb
and
uninformed.
But
as
a
former
IT
guy,
I
dare
say
there's
the
phrase
that's
not
a
bug,
it's
a
feature,
right?
To
keep
you
away
from
the
news.
They're
using
the
old
music
laws.
For
those
who
don't
know,
I'm
in
Detroit,
so
I'm
across
from
Windsor,
Ontario.
Canada
has
always
had
special
laws.
Canadian
stations
must
play
X
number
of
Canadian
content
to
prevent
US
Artists
from
overloading
Canadian
stations.
That's
good
to
some
degree.
I
got
to
hear
a
lot
of
Canadian
artists
I
would
not
otherwise
have
heard.
It
seems
to
me
like
they're
trying
to
twist
that
to
impose
this.
They
are.
They
are
flag
of
sorts.
Yeah,
a
backdoor
censorship.
See,
Canada
has
always
had
strange
regulations
like
that.
That
would
probably
seem
strange
to
you
in
the
United
States.
And
it's
because
we
traditionally
with,
you
know,
regular
legacy
media
or
mediums
like
radio,
tv,
newspapers.
Canada
being
a
huge
country
right
on
the
border
with,
you
know,
right
up
against
the
United
States,
you
have
very
powerful
media.
You
had.
Your
population
is
10
times
ours.
We're
bombarded
with
US
signals.
So
the
Canadian
government,
in
order
to,
because
there's
so
much
competition,
if
you
will,
from
US
Broadcasters,
they've
said
to
Canadian
broadcasters,
you
must
provide
so
much
Canadian
content,
even
Canadian
news.
When
I
was
working
for
CTV
all
those
years,
my
job
was
really
only
there
because
the
government
forced
CTV
to
have
a
news
bureau
in
the
city
that
I
worked
in.
If
it
wasn't
for
that,
CTV
probably
would
not
have
bothered.
They
would
have
done
news
all
out
of
Toronto
or
something
like
that.
They
wouldn't
have
had
reporters
in.
In
other
cities.
So
in
order
to
get
their
broadcast
licenses,
they
would
have
to
have
what
they
call
a
promise
of
performance
declaration.
And
they
have
to
promise
to
provide
certain
amount
of
news
coverage,
all
Canadian
content.
You
know,
it
goes
on
and
on.
So
there
are
regulations
that
have
been
in
place
like
that
for
a
long
time,
and
they're
trying
to
basically
do
the
same
thing
now
with
the
Internet.
And
it's
having
these
crazy
unintended
consequences
because
the
Internet
is
not
television.
And
it's
a
completely
new
era.
I
dare
say
it's
not
a
bug,
it's
a
feature.
These
fascists
want
that
control.
And
again,
we
would
see
that
in
the
US
and
stand
up
and
say,
whoa,
you
are
completely
interfering
in
free
markets
and
be
outraged
at
that.
But
a
geography
lesson
for
those
perhaps
in
southern
United
States
who
may
not
recognize
or
realize
what
us
in
the
northern
states
do.
That
border
with
Canada.
Canada,
you
look
at
a
map,
is
a
huge
landmass,
but
90%
of
your
population
is
in
one
tenth
of
the
lower
part
of
your
provinces.
Therefore,
like
you
said,
our
northern
states,
airwaves
and
influence
bombards
the
90%
of
your
population.
That's
exactly
right.
That's
why
I
actually,
for
my
automotive
television
show,
we
broadcast
out
of
US
Stations,
including
wkbw,
Buffalo
So
my,
my
automotive
program
runs
on
that
station
and
then
it
gets
picked
up
by
its
terrestrial.
So
it
beams
back
over
into
Canada
by
off
air
and
then
gets
picked
up
by
Canadian
cable
companies
and
satellite
companies
and
then
gets
beamed
across
the
country
that
way.
It's
WKBW
is
sitting
right
there
on
the
border.
So
I
do
that
show
that
way.
Anyway,
that's
way
off
topic.
You
get
me
back
on
track,
Joe.
Yeah,
this.
You're
again
Canadian,
so
that
why
I
want
you
on.
In
your
perspective,
you
know
who
Tom
McDonald
the
rapper
is,
the
former
wrestler,
right?
No,
I
don't.
I
don't
know.
Oh,
you
don't?
Okay,
I
don't.
I'm
not
into
rap
and
I
don't
really
watch
wrestling.
So
yeah,
I'm
at
a
bit
of
a
loss.
Well,
he
is
a
Canadian
rapper
living
in
the
U.S.
who
knows?
He
may
have
become
a
U.S.
citizen
by
now,
but
he's
controversial
because
he
does
a
lot
of
political
content.
So
he's
leans
right,
but
I
dare
not
say
he's
a
conservative
and
definitely
not
a
Republican.
So
there's
the
cancel
culture
always
going
at
him
and
that.
But
he's
purely
independent
and
sells
everything
direct.
I
bring
him
up
for
this
odd
gray
area.
And
back
to
the
odd
areas.
In
the
law
we
all
understand
and
recognize
as
a
male,
you
do
not
get
to
beat
up
on
a
female.
We
pretty
much
call
it
patriarchy,
if
you
like
leftist
loons.
But
the
law
generally
recognizes
that
a
male
is
indeed
far
more
stronger.
And
you
don't
get
to
abuse
a
girlfriend,
a
spouse,
a
daughter.
Tom
has
a
song.
Maybe
you
could
look
it
up
when
we're
done
here.
Called
Hitting
a
Woman.
And
that's
why
I
brought
that
up.
And
one
of
the
lines
is
you
think
you're
a
bad
bitch,
right?
But
you
know
how
that
would
play
out
in
a
fight.
He's
talking
about
a
woman
goading
him.
And.
Or
in
some
cases
you
can
see
a
man
is
charged
with
assault,
but
clearly
when
the
video
comes
out,
he's
defending
himself
against
an
aggressive
female.
And
we
don't
get
that
benefit
of
the
doubt
because
of
the
patriarchal
mindset.
One
might
say,
yes,
I
knew
that.
Was
don't
hit,
don't
hit
women.
Men
in
general
are
stronger
than
women,
which
is
indeed
why
I
want
to
protect
women's
sports.
And
biological
males
have
no
place
in
female
sports.
It
was
just
on
the
news.
There
is
a
female
at
a
college
playing
in
the
male
college
NCAA
football,
first
ever
woman,
non
kicker
role
playing.
Generally
women
are
weaker,
but
if
they're
strong
enough.
Well,
let
Them
play
like
Ronda
Rousey
would
absolutely
kick
my
butt
any
time
of
the
day
or
night.
She
could
sit
on
the
couch
eating
Krispy
Kremes
for
three
years
and
I
could
go
into
training
and
she'd
still
kick
my
butt.
So
for
every
rule
there
is
an
exception.
And
that
in
of
itself
gets
us
back
to
gray
areas.
But
I'm,
I'm
Canadian,
so,
you
know,
when
I
was
a
kid
playing
hockey
growing
up,
I
played
hockey
too.
So
we
have
that
in
common.
Yeah,
yeah.
Girls
hockey
was
just
sort
of,
you
know,
in
its
infancy
in
Canada.
They
were
trying
to
get
more
girls
to
play
minor
league
hockey.
And
you
know,
I
played
on
what
they
called
a
competitive
team.
So
we
were
a
travel
team.
They
had
these,
this,
this
girls
team
and
they
were
much
older,
much
bigger,
right?
And
they
wanted
to
play
against
us.
And
so
we
did.
They
arranged
a
game
and
we
played
this
girls
hockey
team.
I
don't
know
exactly
where
this
story
is
going,
but
I
can
only
tell
you
that
we
cleaned
their
clocks,
right?
Like
we
just,
we
kept
scoring
and
scoring
and
scoring
and
scoring
and
scoring.
And
it
felt
really
bad
because
I
don't
know
what
the
score
at
the
end
was.
It
was
like,
I
don't
know,
25
to
nothing
or
something.
It
was
like,
it
was
just,
it
was
brutal
at
the
time.
That
brings
to
mind.
That
felt
like
I
was
hitting
a
girl.
Yeah,
that
brings
to
my
mind
the
US
Women's
soccer
team
and
that
dumb.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
going
to
say
it.
Rapinoe
that
I
can't
stand.
Glad
she's
retired.
A
lot
of
us
people
were
glad
they
got
their
clock
clean
and
they
made
an
early
exit
because
of
her
interjecting
the
politics
of
the
sports.
When
you're
there
to
represent
your
country,
just
represent
your
country.
Kneeling
for
the
anthem.
You
know,
the
US
Women's
soccer
team
played
a
high
school
boys
soccer
team
and
same
thing,
got
their
frickin
clock
cleaned.
I
gotta
tell
you
though,
Joseph,
I
gotta
tell
you
something.
Okay,
so.
Well,
while
that
did
happen,
I
have
to
acknowledge
that
at
the
time
that,
that
girls
hockey
team,
they
just.
The
minor
league
hockey
system
wasn't
really
set
up
for
them
yet.
So
they
just
didn't
have
the
same
training,
they
didn't
have
the
same.
You
know,
a
lot
of
them
hadn't
started
as
young
as,
as
we
had.
Right.
So
they
were
at
a
severe
disadvantage.
Even
though
they
were
much
older
than
us,
we
were
like
little
kids
and
they
were
probably
about
three
years,
four
years
older
than
us
and
we
still
cleaned
their
clocks.
But
my
aunt,
my
Aunt
Betty
Who's
God
bless
her
soul,
no
longer
with
us.
She
taught
me
a
lesson
in
the
most
severe
way.
I
wanted
to
play
baseball.
I
want
to
play
catch
with.
With
my
dad.
But
we
had
company
and
no
one
would
play
catch
with
me.
I
was
just
a
kid,
little
kid.
And.
And
she.
And
she
said,
well,
I'll
play
with
you.
And
I
said,
you
can't
play
baseball.
You're
a
girl.
So
she
said,
well,
yes,
I
can.
And
then
what.
What
we
did
is
she.
She
took
the
baseball
bat
and
I
had
to
throw
the
ball
to
her.
And
I'm
just
playing
in
my
front
yard,
right?
And
she
kept
hitting
that
ball.
She'd
whack
that
ball.
And
she
did
a
home.
She
had
home
run
after
home.
She'd
knock
it
all
the
way
out
into,
you
know,
mile
away.
And
then
I'd
have
to
go
get
the
stupid
ball,
bring
it
back.
Oh,
yeah.
And
then,
and
then
she
was
like,
yay,
home
run.
And
I'd
throw
it
again
and
then
she'd
make
me
run
and
go
get
that
damn
ball.
Yeah.
So
I
learned
a
lesson
that
day
that
girls
can
play
baseball.
I'm
glad
you
made
that
caveat
about
your
training
level
versus
the
female
hockey
because
I
have
a
younger
sister.
She
wanted
to
play
hockey.
I
mean,
you
know,
she
wanted
to
be
on
the
team
with
me.
I
was
a
goaltender.
The
women's
USA
soccer
team
trained,
supposed
going
on
to
be
professional
soccer
players.
Losing
to
a
high
school
amateur
boys
team
who
just
took
anyone
and
every.
Unlike
the
Olympic
team
who
supposedly
picks
the
best
and
the
brightest.
Their
random
team
clean
their
clock.
And
since
we
have
hockey
in
common,
do
you
know
who
man
in
Rome
is?
Mano
Rome?
Yeah.
French
Canadian.
First
female
to
be
signed
to
the
NHL.
The
Golden.
Yeah.
Unfortunately
they
didn't
bring
her
up
to
the
NHL.
They
kept
her
in
the
farm
team.
She
played
at
least
one
game
in
the
NHL,
if
I
recall.
I
think
it
was
a
preseason
though,
not
a
standard
regular
season.
So
it
wasn't
official.
I'm
glad
you
know
her.
And
yeah,
I've
got
autograph
pictures
of
her.
She's
an
idol
of
mine.
So,
yeah,
I,
I'm
all
for
women's
sports
and
when
they
can
play
with
the
men,
please
do.
But
not
Leah
Thomas,
who
is
600
ranking
and
male
swimmers
all
of
a
sudden
breaking
female
swimming
records.
No.
Claiming
to
be
a
woman.
No.
Okay.
So
with
that
in
my
shows,
I
try
not
to
go
much
more
than
40
minutes.
So
let
me
close
and
say
yes.
Remember,
this
is
conjunction
with
the
libertybeacon.com
the
things
usually
a
lot
of
gray
area
part
one
gray
areas
part
two
and
that
show
will
be
with
Ms.
Liz
another
Kian
as
I
like
to
just
lovingly
jokingly
jab
call
them
but
please
too
check
out
by
them
flips
off
the
scotus
both
affirmative
action
and
student
debt
additions.
Norton
v.
Shelby
a
very
important
case
regarding
government
overreach
and
usurpation.
The
deep
state
Alphabet
agencies
long
either
unconstitutional
or
overstepping
their
congressional
authority.
Bidenomics
part
one
and
part
two
remembering
our
freedoms
beyond
the
fourth
of
July
that's
there
more
recently
censorship
of
social
media
still
I'm
still
my
main
account
banned
on
Twatter.
So
even
though
Elon's
there
you
can't
get
a
human
to
talk
to
to
get
it
on.
You're
banned
on
Twitter.
Yeah
I
have
author
a
backup
you
know
just
little
piddly
account
that's
mainly
meant
to
promote
my
books
and
this
show.
And
then
lastly
I'll
mention
a
piece
on
ranked
choice
voting
I
urge
you
that
Season
1
Episode
2
I
urge
people
to
check
out
that
article
and
that
show
because
Charlie
Kirk
doesn't
tell
you
everything.
He
only
gives
you
his
little
thing
so
he
can
attack
McConnell.
Rightfully
so.
But
like
Paul
Harvey
says,
you
listen
to
my
show,
read
that
article,
you
will
know
the
rest
of
the
story.
So
thank
you,
Rick.
Please
tell
us
again
where
people
can
find
you
if
they
want
to
reach
out
and
or
to
watch
your
show.
Well,
we're
on
YouTube,
we're
on
Rumble,
we're
on
Facebook,
Twitter,
Twitch,
Odyssey,
the
main
ones.
Right.
Rumble's
the
word
where
we
really
want
people
to
go.
And
you
can
always
find
us
at
mavericknews,
ca
or
mavericknewschannel.com
that
will
take
you
to
our
website.
You
can
see
a
lot
of
our
videos
on
there.
You
can
also
find
the
link
to
Rumble
right
on
the
header.
So
I
encourage
you
to
just
head
over
there
and
that's
the
easiest
way
to
find
us.
We
have
a
growing
community,
a
real
family
developing
over
there.
It's.
It's
a
lively
discussion
every
night.
Come
on
over,
join
us,
jump
in
the
chat,
join
the
maverick
family.
And.
And
we
actually
go
through
the.
The
process
of
actually
knighting
people
from
time
to
time
too.
So
if
you're.
If
you're
a.
A
freedom
fighter
and
someone
who
believes
in
using
your
superpowers
for
good
and
never
evil,
sign
me
up.
Sign
me
up.
You
might
just
end
up
being
a
Maverick
Knight
if
you.
Oh,
that
would
be
a
maverick.
Oh,
such
a
badge
of
er.
But
like
your
brevity,
the
soul
of
wit
and
your
yeses.
I'll
conclude
by
just
saying
one
word.
Exit.
Bye,
Ciao
for
now.
Ground
Cow
like
and
subscribe
to
christitutionalist
Politics
Podcast
and
Savaged
Unfiltered.
Maybe
even
go
back
a
few
years
and
dig
up
some
old
the
Patriot
Angles
Share
episodes.
We
need
your
help
to
grow
the
show.
Thank
you
for
having
tuned
into
Constitutionalist
Politics
Show.
If
you
haven't
already,
please
check
out
my
primary
internationally
available
book
Terror
Strikes
Coming
soon
to
a
City
near
you.
Available
anywhere
books
are
sold
or
autographed.
Copies
are
available
online
direct
from
me
via
terroristrikes.info
shop
and
you
can
obviously
learn
more
about
the
very
non
traditional
or
fluffy
style
Christian
book,
but
a
Christian
book
nonetheless.
Also
please
tune
into
Savage
Unfiltered
Podcast,
of
which
I
am
a
co
host,
and
be
sure
to
check
out
more
about
today's
discussion@the
libertybeacon.com
where
my
articles
drop
every
Saturday.
In
addition
to
seeing
the
course
finding
the
libertybeacon.com
piece
referenced
in
any
episode
of
Christitutionalist
podcast,
see
to
the
show
transcript
on
podcast
platforms
that
provide
access
to
it
like
buzzsprout@tinyurl.com
christitutionalist
for
additional
bonus
material
there
in
the
transcript.
Thank
you.
Take
care.
God
bless.
It
is
a
myth
that
terrorism
stopped
during
COVID
Unfortunately,
mainstream
media
opted
to
prioritize
pandemic
hysteria
over
promoting
all
news.
Terrorism
continues.
Simply
hoping
that
it
doesn't
affect
you
is
not
a
strategy.
The
new
book
Terror
Strikes
Coming
soon
to
a
City
near
you,
featured
on
the
Author
show,
is
now
available
in
paperback
from
bookstores
online
or
as
an
e
book
exclusively
through
Amazon
Kindle.
Terror
Strikes
Coming
soon
to
a
City
near
you
by
Joseph
M.
Leonard
Order
today.